Do you agree with the definition for ‘art’ as it’s explained in the reading above? Why or why not? Can you add to the definition? Is your definition coming from a subjective or objective perspective?
Yes, in part I do; art si about the the creación of aesthetic subjective forms. But with this definition we must define what is aesthetic and to which extent something might classify inside this parameters.
The Joseph Brodsky definition of it is somewhat more open to interpretations because it doesn’t really clarify what is art. Instead it tells what art is about.
Maybe art is not a concept to define. There are hundreds of things humanity can’t yet explain completely. I think art is not about a bunch of critics in a gallery trying to defining it but something more abstract and intimately subjective. You can’t expect all the curves, lines , forms and colors of different artists’ works throughout history to fit in one and absolute definition.