Do you agree with the definition for ‘art’ as it’s explained in the reading above? Why or why not? Can you add to the definition? Is your definition coming from a subjective or objective perspective?
The definition of ‘art’ that is explained in the reading above jumps around a bit with what it’s trying to say. There are two different definitions that are in the reading, one that the majority of people conclude and the actual definition. I do agree with the two definitions that are in the reading, but I wish to add a bit more to it.
Art is something that has been created to be viewed. It’s been made to show off something like a talent or picture or a feature. Anything can be art. In fact, everything is art, because everything is made to be viewed and admired because God created everything as art. My definition is more subjective.