Defination of art



The definition of art and its limitation in a particular form seems to be so distant. It is similar to the definition of philosophy. The problem is not in the lack of knowledge but in the nature of art itself, where the product of the human soul is relative to its definition. Therefore, there is no such thing as an objective definition because the definition of art seems to be subject to historical, social, cultural and political contexts. Deal with it. And even academics do not rest on the fact that art is an expression of the human soul. That definition itself detracts from art. Is art just an expression? It can not be anything else.
It seems to me that there is no objective definition but that all definitions are personal in the nature of dealing with art .


Ah that’s true, can’t agree more righty said to be frank.